Rissman Hendricks & Oliverio, LLP v. MIV Therapeutics Inc et al
| Rissman Hendricks & Oliverio, LLP |
| MIV Therapeutics Inc, MIV Scientific Holdings, Ltd, Biosync Scientific PVT, Alan P. Lindsay, Patrick McGowan and Chris Xunan Chen |
| Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and Bank of America |
| 1:2011cv10791 |
| May 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Mark L. Wolf |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
251
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. (SEE ATTACHED.pdf) On October 8, 2013, plaintiff Rissman, Hendricks & Oliverio LLP ("Rissman") filed an Assented to Motion to Withdraw Plaintiff's Pending Motion for Contempt Against Alan P. Lindsay (the "Motion") (Docket No. 246) and Plaintiff's Status Report on Impending Settlement - II (Docket No. 247). The Motion reflects what appear to be some mistaken assumptions. In any event, its implications for the continuance of this ca se are not clear to the court. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. A hearing on the Motion will be held on October 11, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. Counsel for Rissman, Lindsay, Thomas J. Deutsch and McMillan LLP, and Riemer & Braunstein shall attend. 2. Unless otherwise ordered, the September 17, 2013 Memorandum and Order Concerning Contempt (Docket No. 215) and the September 27, 2013 Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 236) remain in effect. Therefore, among other things, unless otherwise ordered, Lindsay and Deutsch shall attend the hearings that are scheduled to resume on October 15, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.(Hohler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
236
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(Hohler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
216
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER In view of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The court shall attempt to serve this Memorandum and Order on defendants MIV Therapeutics Inc., MIV Scientific Holdings Ltd., Biosync Sc ientific PVT, and Chris Xunan Chen. 2. Riemer shall promptly send each defendant named in paragraph 1 hereinabove, the subpoena and this Memorandum and Order, and offer to discuss them with each defendant. 3. Riemer shall also promptly send to eac h such defendant the September 17, 2013 Memorandum and Order Concerning Contempt, which is being given to Riemer with this Memorandum and Order.4. By October 2, 2013, Riemer shall report on its efforts to have this Memorandum and Order, and the Me morandum and Order Concerning Contempt, delivered to each defendant named in paragraph 1 hereinabove and the results of its efforts to do so. 5. By October 3, 2013, each defendant named in paragraph 1 hereinabove shall file, and serve on the othe r parties and Riemer, an affidavit stating whether the defendant asserts that any of the defendant's confidential communications with Riemer are now privileged and, if so, whether the defendant wishes to assert any possible attorney-client privilege to prevent Riemer from producing to plaintiff the subpoenaed documents. Any defendant who does not file a timely response to this Order will be deemed to have waived any possible attorney-client privilege.(Hohler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
200
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. (MacDonald, Gail)
|
|
Filing
193
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. (Hohler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
183
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered granting 165 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. (MacDonald, Gail)
|
|
Filing
125
Judge Mark L. Wolf: SEQUESTRATION ORDER entered. (Hohler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
79
Chief Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(Hohler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
49
Ch. Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER allowing in part and denying in part 34 Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Protective Order Restraining Threatening Of Fact Witnesses. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
