Davis et al v. Grimes et al
| Christopher Davis, William P. Thompson, Randy Cole, Wilson Lobao, Robert Capone, Ryan Shaughnessy and Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. |
| Richard C. Grimes, Niel Oullette, Robert L. Champagne and Gary J. Gemme |
| 1:2013cv10246 |
| February 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Norfolk |
| F. Dennis Saylor |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Robert L. Champagne, Richard C. Grimes and the 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Robert Capone, Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc., Christopher Davis, Wilson Lobao, William P. Thompson are DENIED without prejudice to their renewal. (Pezzarossi, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
91
Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on Factual Disputes and Need for Evidentiary Hearing. (Pezzarossi, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
71
Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying the Motions ( 30 and 36 ) for Summary Judgment. Supplemental memoranda and further motions or requests for relief deadline is April 25, 2014. (See attached memorandum and order for further details.) (Cicolini, Pietro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
