Aldrich v. Young

Defendant: William G. Young
Plaintiff: Robert Aldrich
 
Case Number: 1:2013cv10466
Filed: March 1, 2013
 
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Douglas P. Woodlock
 
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed#Document Text
July 18, 2013 25 Opinion or Order of the Court Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 9) is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify and Discharge Assistant U.S. Attorney From Representing Defendant (Docket No. 10) is DE NIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Disqualification of the DOJ (Docket No. 17) is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing on the Motion for Disqualification (Docket No. 18) is DENIED; and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Final D isposition on Whether or Not the DOJ is Disqualified From Representing Defendant (Docket No. 19) is DENIED;6.Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply With Rules of Civil Procedure (Docket No. 11) is DENIED; 7.Plaintiffs req uest for a referral of his complaint to the Commission on Judicial Misconduct is DENIED; 8.Plaintiffs Motion Requesting to be Provided with Written Notice of All Electronic Filings as a Non ECF User (Docket No. 22) is DENIED;9.Defendants Motion to D ismiss (Docket No. 4) is ALLOWED as to all claims;10.This action is DISMISSED; and11.This Court hereby CERTIFIES that any appeal by the plaintiff of any of the rulings contained in this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith. (PSSA, 1)
August 7, 2013 32 Opinion or Order of the Court Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER entered: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 28) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 25). Although plaintiff has been permitted to procee d in forma pauperis in other cases filed in this Court and in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, this denial is based on my conclusion that any appeal of the dismissal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). With respect to the Motion to Appoint Appellate Counsel (Docket No. 29), I lack authority to appoint appellate counsel, and therefore plaintiff's motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewing the motion in the First Circuit. (PSSA, 1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Aldrich v. Young
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William G. Young
Represented By: George B. Henderson, III
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Aldrich
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]