Aldrich v. Ruano

Plaintiff: Robert Aldrich
Defendant: Raquel Ruano
Case Number: 1:2013cv10754
Filed: April 2, 2013
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: William G. Young
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 10, 2013 17 Opinion or Order of the Court Judge William G. Young: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Robert Aldrich is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $30.57, pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A) with respect to his obligation to pay the District Court filing fee; The remainder of the fee $319.43 is to be assessed and collected in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). (PSSA, 1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aldrich v. Ruano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Aldrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raquel Ruano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.