Blackette v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Suzanna E. Blackette
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Case Number: 1:2013cv11546
Filed: June 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: William G. Young
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER"For the aforementioned reasons, Blackettes motion to remand, ECF No. 13, is DENIED, and the Agencys motion for an order affirming the decision of the Commissioner, ECF No. 25, is GRANTED.SO ORDERED."(Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blackette v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzanna E. Blackette
Represented By: Ronald B. Eskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Represented By: Rayford A. Farquhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?