Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund |
| Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Forest Laboratories Inc. |
| 1:2013cv13113 |
| December 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
247
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered RE: 864 . Request Granted. Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02067-NMG, 1:13-cv-13113-NMG, 1:14-cv-13848-NMG(Franklin, Yvonne)
|
|
Filing
235
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs objections to the rulings by Magistrate Judge Bowler on plaintiffs motion to compel (Painters and Kiossovski) (Docket No. 750) and defendants motion to quash the third party subpoena (Painters)(Docket No. 843) are OVERRULED and those rulings are AFFIRMED.So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
215
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 200 Motion to Seal Document and to file two briefs with excess pages 203 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 207 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion&quo t;Motion to file document under seal is allowed; motion to file briefs in excess pages is allowed, in part, and denied, in part; plaintiff's oppositions to defendant's Daubert and summary judgment motions shall be limited to 30 pages each." (Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
117
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered re 112 Proposed Document(s) submitted filed by Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund "Treated as a motion to amend schedule for pre-trial deadlines and motion allowed."(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
77
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 71 Motion for Protective Order; denying 71 Motion for Extension of Time the discovery and pretrial deadlines in this action are STAYED until 30 days after the First Circuit rules on the plaintiff's petition to appeal the denial of class certification. If the First Circuit allows the petition, the Court will reconsider the propriety of staying this case. If the First Circuit denies the petition the Court will reset the di scovery and pretrial deadlines, allow discovery to proceed in this case and allow defendants to renew their motion for a protective order to limit the scope of discovery. Defendants' motion for a protective order and/or extension of the discovery deadlines is, therefore, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
65
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re MDL 09md2067 "plaintiffs motion to certify class (Docket No. 546) is DENIED." (Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
28
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons 1) defendants' motion to dismiss Painters' amended complaint (Civil Action No. 13-cv-13113, Docket No. 18 ) is as to Count V, ALLOWED , but is otherwise DENIED; and 2) defendants' motion to dismiss Allied Services/NM UFCW complaint (Civil Action No. 14-cv-10784, Docket No. 11 ) is ALLOWED. So ordered."Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02067-NMG, 1:13-cv-13113-NMG, 1:14-cv-10784-NMG(Moore, Kellyann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
