Soft-Aid, Inc. v. SAM-ON-DEMAND, LLC et al
| Soft-Aid, Inc. |
| SAM-ON-DEMAND, LLC and David Mansfield |
| 1:2014cv10419 |
| February 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| William G. Young |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation as to Count I for the other copyrights Plaintiff claims are infringed and note that Defendant did notobject to this portion of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court rejects Defendant's objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court ALLOWS Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement the Complaint, 133 . The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 110 , as to misappropriation of trade secrets (Count III), breach of contract (Count IV), and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count V). The Court ALLOWS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Lanham Act cla ims(Count II), unfair competition (Count VI), violations of Chapter 93A (Count VII), and unjust enrichment (Count VIII). The Court DENIES summary judgment on Defendants' counterclaims for defamation (Count I), intentional interference with busin ess relationships (Count II), uniform trade deceptive practices (Count III), and declaratory relief (Count V). The Court ALLOWS summary judgment for Plaintiff on Defendants' counterclaim for CFAA violations (Count IV). Within fourteen (14) days , the parties shall file a joint status report stating (a) the anticipated duration of trial; (b) whether the parties anticipate any mediation process and, if so, the amount of time needed for such a process (either in the Courts mediation program or otherwise as the parties prefer); and (c) whether all parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge assigned to this case (the parties shall not report their individual positions and the failure to consent shall not result in any adverse substantive consequence). (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
