Lopes v. Riendeau et al
| Dana E. Lopes |
| Geraldine Riendeau, Barbara Berg, UMass Correctional Health Services, Dyana Nickl, Lawrence Weiner, Shawna Nasuti, Paul Caratazzola, Pat Davenport and Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare |
| 1:2014cv10679 |
| March 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Plymouth |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
166
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. "In accordance with the forgoing, defendants motions for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 137 , 147 and 153 ) are ALLOWED."(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
121
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket Entry # 118 ). In accordance with the foregoing discussion, the motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry # 118 ) is DENIED without prejudice. (Patton, Christine)
|
|
Filing
67
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. ORDER adopting in part 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Action on motion: granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and/or Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 26 Motion to Dismiss(Danieli, Chris)
|
|
Filing
8
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered denying without prejudice 7 Motion to Amend. (PSSA, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
