Sanchez v. New England Confectionery Company, Inc. et al
| Isaias Sanchez |
| New England Confectionery Company, Inc. and Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Milners International Union |
| 1:2014cv11353 |
| March 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Denise J. Casper |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - the Court ALLOWS Local 348's motion for summary judgment. D. 50. Because Sanchez's hybrid claim requires proving wrongdoing by both NECCO and Local 348, the Court dismisses hi s claim against NECCO as well. Balser v. Int'l Union of Elec., Elec., Salaried, Mach. & Furniture Workers (IUE) Local 201, 661 F.3d 109, 118 (1st Cir. 2011) (noting that to prevail on a hybrid claim, "the plaintiff must prove both that the employer broke the [collective bargaining agreement] and that the union breached its duty of fair representation" to recover against either defendant). Judgment shall be entered in favor of both defendants.(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
27
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court DENIES Sanchez's motion to disqualify Local 348's counsel and DENIES Local 348 and NECCO's motions to dismiss, D. 10, D. 15.(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
