Feijoo v. Spencer et al
Plaintiff: Humberto Feijoo
Defendant: Luis Spencer, Kelly Ryan, David Havens and David Griffiths
Case Number: 1:2014cv12833
Filed: June 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Indira Talwani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. If a timely motion for substitution is not filed with the Court, this action may be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Maria Feijo o, 36 Red Cedar Road, Mashpee, MA 02649. Except as to the motion for substitution, the case is hereby stayed pending further order of the court. The clerk mailed a copy of this order to Maria Feijoo, 36 Red Cedar Road, Mashpee, MA 02649.(PSSA, 4)
November 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Judge Indira Talwani: Memorandum and Order. Plaintiffs Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs 11 is granted for the purpose of having the marshal service plaintiffs complaint on the defendants. Plaintiffs Motion R equesting Fees and Costs of Service 10 is granted. The Clerk shall issue summonses and the United States Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the summonses, complaint, and this Memorandum and Order upon the defendants as directed by plaintiff wi th all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Notwithstanding Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 120 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to complete service. The defendants are required to re spond to the complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2). Plaintiffs motions for reconsideration of appointment of counsel 9 14 are denied without prejudice to renewal after the defendants have filed a responsive pleading and upon good cause shown. (PSSA, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feijoo v. Spencer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Humberto Feijoo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luis Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Havens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Griffiths
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?