Esoterix Genetic Laboratories, LLC v. Qiagen N.V. et al
Plaintiff: Esoterix Genetic Laboratories, LLC
Defendant: Qiagen N.V., Qiagen GmbH, Qiagen North American Holdings, Ltd., Qiagen Manchester, Ltd. and Qiagen, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv13228
Filed: August 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Leo T. Sorokin
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 119 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum and Order, Esoterix and LabCorps Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 98] is DENIED. Qiagens Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [ECF No. 88] is ALLOWED with respect to Counts II, III, IV, and V of its Counterclaims. (Montes, Mariliz)
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered For the foregoing reasons, Qiagens Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [ECFNo. 26] is hereby ALLOWED as to Count I, and DENIED as to all other Counts of the Amended Complaint. (Montes, Mariliz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Esoterix Genetic Laboratories, LLC v. Qiagen N.V. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esoterix Genetic Laboratories, LLC
Represented By: James M. Campbell
Represented By: Christopher Robert Howe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qiagen N.V.
Represented By: Peter E. Ball
Represented By: Ryan M. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qiagen GmbH
Represented By: Peter E. Ball
Represented By: Ryan M. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qiagen North American Holdings, Ltd.
Represented By: Peter E. Ball
Represented By: Ryan M. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qiagen Manchester, Ltd.
Represented By: Peter E. Ball
Represented By: Ryan M. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qiagen, Inc.
Represented By: Peter E. Ball
Represented By: Ryan M. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?