Latimore v. Suffolk County House of Correction et al
| Jason K. Latimore |
| Suffolk County House of Correction, John Doe Correctional Officer #1 and John Doe Correctional Officer #2 |
| 1:2014cv13378 |
| August 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Marianne B. Bowler |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
332
Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER re 313 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Dan Allen, Roseanne Barrows, Ryan Dorgan, Paula Sullivan, Kenneth Trotman. For completeness, the Court will assume that Count IX contains cla ims for both substantive due process and equal protection violations. For the reasons detailed herein and in the SJ Decisions, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED. Judgment shall enter in favor of the Defendants on Count IX. (Thomson, Katherine)
|
|
Filing
329
Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered re 328 MOTION for an Extension of Time and Request for a Court Order by Jason K. Latimore. (Thomson, Katherine)
|
|
Filing
293
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 242 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Belpedio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
284
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Plaintiff's request for a Court Order (docket entry #274)(Belpedio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
157
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Docket Entry # 105 ). The motion to dismiss (Docket Entry # 28 ) is ALLOWED as to all claims against defendants in their official capacities; Count Five against Barrows and Dorgan; Count Five against Trotman as it relates to the May 29, 2014 incident; Count Six as it relates to the August 7, 2014 incident; the equal protection claims in Count Nine; Count Eight against Tompkins; and the Eighth Amendment claim in Count Nine against Tompkins. The motion is otherwise DENIED. The dismissal of the claims against Tompkins is without prejudice. (Patton, Christine)
|
|
Filing
62
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket Entry # 48 ); Ex Parte Motions for Funds to Hire Investigator (Docket Entry ## 30 , 33 , 38 ); Ex Parte Motion for Funds to Hire Data Retrieval Technician (Docket Entry # 39 ). The motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry # 48 ) is DENIED without prejudice and the motions for funds to hire an investigator (Docket Entry ## 30 , 33 , 38 ) and a data retrieval technician (Docket Entry # 39 ) are DENIED. (Patton, Christine)
|
|
Filing
24
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. In accordance with the foregoing discussion, SCSD's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry # 9 ) is ALLOWED as to all counts. (Patton, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
