Morales v. Spencer et al
| Miguel A. Morales |
| Luis S. Spencer, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Bruce I. Gelb, Michael Rodriguez, Osvaldo Vidal, Kristie Ladouceaur, Stacia Span, Lynn Chernesky, Steve Carrier, Terry Fougere, Kate Silvia, Thomas M. Tocci and Deborah Leabman |
| 1:2015cv10074 |
| January 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Norfolk |
| M. Page Kelley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) Motion [#31] for Trial by Jury is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) Motion [#32] to Amend and Add a Party is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) Motion # 33 to Enter Notice ofSettlement Agreement is DENIED; 4. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) Motion # 34 to Stay Proceedings is DENIED; 5. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) Motion # 35 to Add a Plaintiff is DENIED; 6. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) Motion # 42 to dismiss DefendantsResponsive Pleading is DENIED; 7. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) Motion # 44 to dismiss Defendants Responsive Pleading is DENIED; 8. Plaintiff's (Ex Parte) # 46 Supplemen tal Motion to Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Responsive Pleading has been considered by the Court and the motion is DENIED; and 9. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss # 39 is GRANTED for the reasons stated above. SO ORDERED."(Moore, Kellyann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
