Orekoya v. Rainer et al
| Sunday Dixon Orekoya |
| Andrew Rainer, Shapiro, Haber and Urmy LLP, John Reinstein, ACLU FM, Gordon Messick Jones, III and Nixon Peabody LLP, |
| 1:2015cv10657 |
| March 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff is SANCTIONED $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars). He shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the $1,000.00 sanction within 30 da ys of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff is ENJOINED from filing any pleadings, complaints, or otherwise unreasonable filings with this Court, against his former attorneys or firms, that are related directly or indirectly to claims prev iously asserted in this Court, unless he first obtains permission of a judicial officer to file. Plaintiff is WARNED that, in the future, non-compliance with this Order will be deemed to be contumacious in nature, and may result in further sanctions. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12) is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Order (Docket No. 15) is DENIED.This action is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. (PSSA, 1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
