Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v Mayo Collaborative Services, et al.
Plaintiff: Athena Diagnostics, Inc. and Isis Innovation Limited
Defendant: Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC d/b/a Mayo Medical Laboratories and Mayo Clinic
Case Number: 1:2015cv40075
Filed: June 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Worcester
Presiding Judge: Indira Talwani
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 152 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING 131 MOTION to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint. (DaSilva, Carolina)
August 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 103 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 25 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(6). (DaSilva, Carolina)
July 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 90 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered finding as moot 79 Motion to Dismiss; granting 84 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in a ccordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document.; granting 88 Motion for Hearing. SEE attached Order. (MacDonald, Gail) Modified date filed on 7/8/2016 date filed (DaSilva, Carolina).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v Mayo Collaborative Services, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Athena Diagnostics, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew J. Kabat
Represented By: Matthew Bowen McFarlane
Represented By: Emmett J. McMahon
Represented By: Manleen K. Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Isis Innovation Limited
Represented By: Andrew J. Kabat
Represented By: Matthew Bowen McFarlane
Represented By: Emmett J. McMahon
Represented By: Manleen K. Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC d/b/a Mayo Medical Laboratories
Represented By: John C. Adkisson
Represented By: Kelly Allenspach Del Dotto
Represented By: Elizabeth M. Flanagan
Represented By: Adam J. Kessel
Represented By: Jonathan E. Singer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic
Represented By: John C. Adkisson
Represented By: Kelly Allenspach Del Dotto
Represented By: Elizabeth M. Flanagan
Represented By: Adam J. Kessel
Represented By: Jonathan E. Singer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?