Johnson v. Astrue

Johnson v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Todd A. Johnson
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	0:2012cv01153
Filed:	May 14, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Carlton
Presiding Judge:	Donovan W. Frank
Presiding Judge:	Jeanne J. Graham
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2014	Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 27 )) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff is awarded $8,534 in attorney's fees. 4. The Government is granted sixty days to determine if the fee award is subject to an offset. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/31/2014. (BJS)
September 26, 2013	Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security Carolyn W. Colvin's objections (Doc. No. 22 ) to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's August 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Grahams August 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 21 ) is ADOPTED. 3. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8 ) is GRANTED. 4. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 17 ) is DENIED. 5. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an award of benefits as of March 29, 2006. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/26/2013. (BJS)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2014

Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 27 )) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff is awarded $8,534 in attorney's fees. 4. The Government is granted sixty days to determine if the fee award is subject to an offset. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/31/2014. (BJS)

September 26, 2013

Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security Carolyn W. Colvin's objections (Doc. No. 22 ) to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's August 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Grahams August 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 21 ) is ADOPTED. 3. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8 ) is GRANTED. 4. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 17 ) is DENIED. 5. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an award of benefits as of March 29, 2006. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/26/2013. (BJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd A. Johnson
Represented By:	Lionel H Peabody
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	David W Fuller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?