Sitzman v. Astrue
| Michael C. Sitzman |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 7:2011cv05006 |
| June 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 7 North Platte Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Final judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 the Defendant's Motion for enlargement of time. The briefing schedule is modified as follows: Defendant shall file a brief by January 16, 2012; Plaintiff may file a reply brief by January 30, 2012; and This case shall be ripe for decision on January 31, 2012. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER -Plaintiffs motion and amended motion for enlargement of time (filings 10 , 11 ) are granted, and the brief attached to the amended motion is accepted for filing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule is modified as follows: Defendant shall file a brief by December 15, 2011; Plaintiff may file a reply brief by December 29, 2011; and This case shall be ripe for decision on December 30, 2011. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
