BRASWELL et al v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY et al
HOMER WADE YARBROUGH, JERRY SMITH, JOEY SMITH, PENNY HICKS, SHANIA SMITH, JAMES SLOAN, JUDY BRASWELL, JACKIE BRASWELL, KATHY MILLER, DEBBIE SLOAN, KAREN SMITH, HAROLD COLLINS, HAYMON HICKS, GINA MYERS SHAW, BONNIE COLLINS and PAMELA LOVELESS |
APEX COMPANIES, LLC and COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY |
1:2018cv00580 |
June 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Davidson |
N C TILLEY |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney MEAGHAN G. BOYD on behalf of Defendant COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY (BOYD, MEAGHAN) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney KELSEY L. KINGSBERY on behalf of Defendant COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY (KINGSBERY, KELSEY) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney MICHAEL A. KAEDING on behalf of Defendant COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY (KAEDING, MICHAEL) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2379956.), filed by COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Removal by Defendant Apex Companies, LLC, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File, #3 Exhibit C - Proof of Service of Process, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Matthew C. Hardesty, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(KAEDING, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.