Cases 1 - 10 of 10
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27391
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HAROLD COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRASWELL et al v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00580
Plaintiff:
HOMER WADE YARBROUGH, JERRY SMITH, JOEY SMITH and others
Defendant:
APEX COMPANIES, LLC and COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harold Collins v. Elite Home Energy, Inc.
as 8:2017cv01747
Plaintiff:
Harold Collins
Defendant:
Elite Home Energy, Inc.
Tavake et al v. Sekona et al
as 5:2017cv01441
Plaintiff:
Mr Harold Collins
Defendant:
George Alani Fua, SAI Construction, Sosiua L. Sekona and others
COLLINS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07612
Plaintiff:
HAROLD COLLINS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brackin v. California Department of State Hospitals et al
as 3:2015cv03351
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brackin
Defendant:
California Department of State Hospitals , Napa State Hospital , Dolly Matteucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins Towing Inc et al v. McGriff Seibels & Williams of Louisiana, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
Collins Towing Inc , Harold Collins and Corrine Collins
Defendant:
McGriff Seibels & Williams of Louisiana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Collins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv12748
Plaintiff:
Tambra Collins and Harold Collins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLINS et al v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv63371
Plaintiff:
HAROLD COLLINS and ISABELLA COLLINS
Defendant:
BORG WARNER CORPORATION, BRAKE & CLUTCH CO. OF PHILA., CHRYSLER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Thomas Harold Collins, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:02-CV-00286
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harold Collins
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
