Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Smith v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Penton v. Haq et al
as 4:2023cv04212
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Yasir Haq, . Tinwalla, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pension Benefit Information, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12489
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC and Berwyn Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roberts v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Stacie Roberts
Defendant:
Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Francois Nader, Sandip Agarwala and others
Carlisle v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08520
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Francois Nader, Sandip Agarwala and others
Smith v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08084
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Ramone Smith
Defendant:
Karen Smith, Hallmark Cards, Inc., Hallmark Benefit Plan Advisory Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-ERISA
Cortella Jones, et al v. Karen Woodson, et al
as 23-12471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORTELLA JONES and MELISSA SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN SMITH WOODSON and DEVON WOODSON
Smith v. Pension Benefit Information, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC and Berwyn Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martin v. Bellendir et al
as 5:2023cv03063
Plaintiff:
Clayton J. Martin
Defendant:
Brian Bellendir, Barton County Jail, Doug Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
