Ealy v. Pickrel et al
| Larry E Ealy |
| John S Pickrel, John Thompson, Diedra Logan, Micheal Saylor and Mike Rankin |
| 3:2009cv00020 |
| January 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON MARCH 16, 2009 (DOC. #3); DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B); CERTIFYING THAT AN APPEAL OF THIS DECISION WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND, CONSEQUENTLY, DENYING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS; AND TERMINATING THE CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 4/3/09. (tt1, )
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint filed by Larry E Ealy - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED; and 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied; and 3. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 4/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 3/16/2009. (jdf1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
