Uniloc USA, Inc., et al v. Microsoft Corp., et al

Plaintiff: Uniloc USA, Inc and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Counter Claimant: Microsoft Corporation
Counter Defendant: Uniloc USA, Inc and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited
Case Number: 1:2003cv00440
Filed: September 26, 2003
Court: Rhode Island District Court
Office: Providence Office
County: Providence
Referring Judge: David L. Martin
Presiding Judge: William E Smith
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 16, 2009 322 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER on Motions in Limine and Trial Management Issues: denying 217 Motion in Limine; denying 220 Motion ; granting in part 234 Motion in Limine; denying 235 Motion in Limine; denying 236 Motion in Limine; denying 237 Motion in Limine; gr anting 238 Motion in Limine; denying 239 Motion in Limine; denying 240 Motion in Limine; denying 241 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 242 Motion in Limine; denying 243 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 244 Motion in Limine; denying 245 Motion in Limine; denying 246 Motion in Limine; granting in part 247 Motion in Limine; granting in part 249 Motion in Limine; denying 298 Motion to Bifurcate. So Ordered by Judge William E Smith on 3/16/2009. (Smith, Rana)
September 29, 2009 412 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER Microsoft's Motion forJudgment as a Matter of Law or, In the Alternative, For a New Trial or Remittitur (Doc. No. 371) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Uniloc's Motion for an Award of Enhanced Damages, for Prejudgm ent and Postjudgment Interest, and for a Permanent Injunction (Doc. No.368) is DENIED AS MOOT. Both Motions to Amend/Correct Judgment (Doc. Nos. 367, 370) and Microsoft's Motion to Strike Improper Matter from Plaintiffs' Reply (Doc. No. 392) are DENIED AS MOOT. The verdict of the jury is VACATED. JUDGMENT shall enter for the Defendant Microsoft. So Ordered by Judge William E Smith on 9/29/2009. (Smith, Rana)
September 29, 2009 413 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Microsoft Corporation against Uniloc USA, Inc., and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 9/29/2009. (Smith, Rana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Uniloc USA, Inc., et al v. Microsoft Corp., et al
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Uniloc USA, Inc
Represented By: Sheri L. Pizzi
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Uniloc Singapore Private Limited
Represented By: Sheri L. Pizzi
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: Frank E. Scherkenbach
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: Frank E. Scherkenbach
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Uniloc USA, Inc
Represented By: Sheri L. Pizzi
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Uniloc Singapore Private Limited
Represented By: Sheri L. Pizzi
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]