US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,959
Town of Portsmouth v. Alviti et al
as 1:2019cv00189
Defendant:
Administrator Carlos Machado, Executive Director Buddy Croft, Deputy Administrator Brandye L. Hendrickson
and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Portsmouth
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
Acosta v. Delaney
as 1:2019cv00188
Defendant:
William Delaney
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
USA v. Tatro et al
as 1:2019cv00185
Garnishee:
Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Defendant:
Mr. Michael Tatro
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act
Abney v. Prime Healthcare Services - Landmark, LLC
as 1:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Prime Healthcare Services - Landmark, LLC
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Abney
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
UMB Bank, N.A. v. City of Central Falls et al
as 1:2019cv00182
Defendant:
City Councilor Jonathan Acosta, Hugo Figueroa, Maria Rivera
and others
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Breach of Contract
Land v. U.S. Nonwovens Corp.
as 1:2019cv00184
Defendant:
U.S. Nonwovens Corp.
Plaintiff:
Richard J Land
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tente et al v. Rexel USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00183
Defendant:
Rexel USA, Inc., Sabastian Porter
Plaintiff:
Alfred Tente, Carol Tente
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Melnyk v. Harrington et al
as 1:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Fred Melnyk
Defendant:
Robert Mushen, Mary-Jane Harrington, Richard Petrin
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
