Uniloc USA, Inc., et al v. Microsoft Corp., et al
| Uniloc USA, Inc and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| Uniloc USA, Inc and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited |
| 1:2003cv00440 |
| September 26, 2003 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| David L. Martin |
| William E Smith |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
413
JUDGMENT in favor of Microsoft Corporation against Uniloc USA, Inc., and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 9/29/2009. (Smith, Rana)
|
|
Filing
322
ORDER on Motions in Limine and Trial Management Issues: denying 217 Motion in Limine; denying 220 Motion ; granting in part 234 Motion in Limine; denying 235 Motion in Limine; denying 236 Motion in Limine; denying 237 Motion in Limine; gr anting 238 Motion in Limine; denying 239 Motion in Limine; denying 240 Motion in Limine; denying 241 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 242 Motion in Limine; denying 243 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 244 Motion in Limine; denying 245 Motion in Limine; denying 246 Motion in Limine; granting in part 247 Motion in Limine; granting in part 249 Motion in Limine; denying 298 Motion to Bifurcate. So Ordered by Judge William E Smith on 3/16/2009. (Smith, Rana)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
