Schofield v. US Bank, NA et al
| Billie R Schofield |
| Harmon Law Offices, P.C., US Bank, NA, USAA Federal Savings Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc., Orlans Moran, PLLC, Julie Morans, Esq., John Precobb, Esq., Frederick Curtis, Paul F Manning, Esq., Centry 21 Hughes & Carey, Towne Auction Company and LSI Title Agency, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00170 |
| April 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| Ronald R Lagueux |
| David L. Martin |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Mr. Schofield's patent failure to comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure- particularly Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) and 9(b)- and the order of this Court dictate that "Amended Complaint No.2" be DISMISSED also granting [3 3] Motion to Dismiss; granting 35 Motion to Dismiss; granting 37 Motion to Dismiss; granting 38 Motion to Dismiss; granting 39 Motion to Dismiss; granting 40 Motion to Dismiss; granting 41 Motion to Dismiss; granting 42 Motion to Dismiss; granting 43 Motion to Dismiss; granting 59 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 60 Motion to Dismiss.. So Ordered by Judge John J. McConnell, Jr on 7/23/12. (Farrell Pletcher, Paula)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
