Letourneau v. Aul et al
| Devon Letourneau |
| Linda Aul, Billy Bogoanes, Lieutenant Sayles and Officer Duray |
| 1:2014cv00421 |
| September 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| Ronald R. Lagueux |
| Patricia A. Sullivan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Rule 70(e) motion for an order of contempt (ECF No. 106) be denied. 106 MOTION for order of contempt filed by Devon Letourneau. Objections to R&R due by 4/15/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 4/1/2024. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for (38 in 1:15-cv-00043-L-PAS, 62 in 1:14-cv-00421-L-PAS) Report and Recommendations,,, (29 in 1:15-cv-00043-L-PAS, 53 in 1:14-cv-00421-L-PAS) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, filed by Devon Letourneau is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. So Ordered by Senior Judge Ronald R. Lagueux on 1/7/2016. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00421-L-PAS, 1:15-cv-00043-L-PAS(Cavaco, Janice)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 41 Report and Recommendations, 29 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Devon Letourneau. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Relief against Nonparties is DENIED. So Ordered by Senior Judge Ronald R. Lagueux on 9/3/2015. (Cavaco, Janice)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
