Lupia v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Paula Lupia |
| C. R. Bard, Inc., Covidien plc, Covidien International Finance, SA, Covidien Trevoux, SCS, Mareane, SA, Floreane Medical Implants SA and Sofradim Production SAS |
| 2:2012cv00090 |
| January 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 28 JOINDER by C. R. Bard, Inc. in Defendant Sofradim Production SAS's Oral Motion to Dismiss; the plaintiff's claims against Sofradim and Bard are DISMISSED with prejudice; because no other defendants remain in the case, the plaintiff's case is closed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/22/2017. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested) (kp)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Sofradim's Motion for immediate dismissal with prejudice is GRANTED as Moulded; the plaintiff is directed to pay Sofradim a $1,000.00 monetary sanction; in the event the plaintiff does not pay Sofradim $1,000.00 within 30 days , the plaintiff's claims against Sofradim shall be dismissed with prejudice without further notice to the plaintiff; the Clerk is directed to post this order on the court's website for 30 days. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/13/2017. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested) (ts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
