Tinsley v. Astrue
Algernon W. Tinsley |
Michael J. Astrue |
3:2010cv01184 |
October 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Cabell |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that Plaintiff's 32 Response is Denied, and the Court Accepts and Incorporates the 31 Magistrates Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendations; which Grants Defendant's 17 Motion for Summa ry Judgment and Dismisses, with prejudice, Plaintiff's civil action; the Court further Orders that this case be dismissed and stricken from the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 10/31/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tinsley v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Algernon W. Tinsley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.