Muffley et al v. Dynamic Energy, Inc. et al
| Gary W. Muffley and National Labor Relations Board |
| M & P Services, Inc. and Dynamic Energy, Inc. |
| 5:2011cv00082 |
| February 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 160 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part Petitioner's 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, as Amended. Respondents are to (1) Offer, on an interim basis, discharged employees Jere my Blankenship, Nathan Brown, Christopher Champagne, Philip Coleman, Steven Paynter and Herrick S. Sheppard reinstatement to their former positions, or if those positions are unavailable, to substantially equivalent positions without prejudice to the ir seniority or any other rights and privileges enjoyed; (2) refrain from discharging employees because of their engagement in union or other protected activities; (3) post copies of this Memorandum Opinion and Order at the Coal Mountain, West Virgin ia mine site; and (4) within 30 days of the entry of this opinion and order, file with the Court, and serve a copy on Petitioner, a sworn affidavit from a responsible official of Respondents, setting forth with specificity the manner in which Respondents have complied with the Court's Order. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 6/30/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (cds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
