Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,754
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff: Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff: Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant: Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgeway v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff: Clifton Marshall Ridgeway
Defendant: Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Hut et al
as 7:2024cv00620
Plaintiff: Deontae L Hudson
Defendant: Hut, McCovery, Hardclaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Plaintiff: Elroy Joshua Adams
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Cahill, Christopher A McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Cronin et al
as 5:2024cv00604
Plaintiff: Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Defendant: Jeffery Cronin and John Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. McClain
as 5:2024cv00584
Petitioner: Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent: Warden Antonio McClain and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawthorne v. Kizer et al
as 5:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: Arice Hawthorne
Defendant: Debra Kizer, Blake Dean, Donna Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant: Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. King
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff: Jessica Kelly
Defendant: Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?