Cases 11 - 20 of 51,727
Tufano v. Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Defendant:
Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators, Erick Solares, Matthew Ptashnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
DeChamplain v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
David Paul DeChamplain
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alphonse v. Rickard
as 3:2024cv00855
Petitioner:
Jammy Alphonse
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams, Jr. v. Ogle et al
as 4:2024cv00853
Petitioner:
Sylvester Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Adam Ogle and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Negron-Roche v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Negron-Roche
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Kifer, Henri Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schirra v. Progressive/Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Loyola Schirra
Defendant:
Progressive/Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Garnett et al v. Transchem, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Zackery Garnett and Debra Lukus
Defendant:
Transchem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
