Cases 41 - 50 of 269,329
Celine SA v. THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A
as 1:2024cv03881
Plaintiff:
Celine SA
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Munch v. Sprout Social, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03867
Plaintiff:
Richard Munch
Defendant:
Sprout Social, Inc., Justyn Howard, Ryan Barretto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Morgan v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
Victoria Morgan
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Westbrook v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2024pq01267
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Westbrook
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Weems v. USA
as 3:2024cv01266
Petitioner:
Neal Ray Weems
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Negron v. Ascension Health
as 1:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
Katherine Negron
Defendant:
Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gold-Smith v. Will County et al
as 1:2024cv03856
Plaintiff:
Robert Gold-Smith
Defendant:
Will County, Joseph Grozik, Policandriotis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Boehmer v. Park et al
as 1:2024cv03855
Plaintiff:
Michael Boehmer
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park, Officer Santillan, Officer Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lord v. Marts Trucking, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lord
Defendant:
Marts Trucking, LLC and Jennings Alderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
