Cases 1 - 10 of 12,256
Shiffer et al v. Great West Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Arrik Shiffer and Tasha Shiffer
Defendant:
Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Layton et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Allyson Layton and Christopher Powers
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Postal Service and Abby Westendorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Andrus v. Commission of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Troy K Andrus
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mattos v. Sterling Medical, LLC
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mattos
Defendant:
Sterling Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roselle v. Beaverhead County Attorney et al
as 4:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
William Clay Roselle
Defendant:
Beaverhead County Attorney, Beaverhead County Sheriff's Office, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney and others
Amerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Joel Lynn Amerson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Capone v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Capone
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
