Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 245,875
Salazar-Salazar (PS) v. Celia
as 1:2024cv01640
Petitioner: Roger Javier Salazar-Salazar
Respondent: Celia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melendez (PS) v. Ceja
as 1:2024cv01641
Petitioner: Leniel Melendez
Respondent: D. Ceja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01643
Petitioner: Jacob Scott
Respondent: A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benavidez (PS) v. Gilden et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Plaintiff: Isaac Benavidez
Defendant: Jane Gilden and Kruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02243
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02244
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Collinge v. Bellendir
as 5:2024cv03096
Petitioner: Adam B. Collinge
Respondent: Brian Bellendir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graef v. Mimbres Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff: Frederick Graef
Defendant: Mimbres Memorial Hospital, Celsio Gonzalez, El Paso Healthcare System, LTD. doing business as Las Palmas Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Escano v. DirecTV, LLC
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff: Ruben Escano
Defendant: DirecTV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Stone v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00595
Petitioner: Brandon Lee Stone
Respondent: Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?