Cases 1 - 10 of 276,435
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kauffman v. 800 Pound Gorilla Media, LLC
as 3:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
David Kauffman
Defendant:
800 Pound Gorilla Media, LLC
Conservation Council for Hawaii v. BRE Iconic GWR Owner LLC
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Conservation Council for Hawai'i and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
BRE Iconic GWR Owner LLC
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
(PC) Mitchell v. CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Edwards v. Trate
as 2:2024cv00887
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Matthew E Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
In the Matter of the Administrative Inspection of Rita R. Thakur, M.D., Weightwise & Family Practice, 636 E. Santa Clara Street, San Jose, California 95112
as 5:2024mc80100
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Administrative Inspection of Rita R. Thakur, M.D., Weightwise & Family Practice, 636 E. Santa Clara Street, San Jose, California 95112
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rita R. Thakur, M.D.
Bennett et al v. TestMax, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03662
Plaintiff:
Alvoid Bennett and Regine Urcia
Defendant:
TestMax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
