General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,931
PEACHER v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00172
Petitioner: ROBERT PEACHER
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner: JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent: DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEATHERY v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00770
Petitioner: AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Respondent: TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner: ROBERT STEWART
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00755
Petitioner: OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent: CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner: RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent: DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner: DENAR ROYAL
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner: DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00163
Petitioner: DENZEL JORDAN
Respondent: WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TISHNER v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00724
Petitioner: JOSHUA W. TISHNER
Respondent: PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?