Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge William Hussmann Jr.
Cases 11 - 20 of 89
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00103
Petitioner: AMIR MORGAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BOULTINGHOUSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00098
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DOWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00063
Petitioner: FRED EDWARD DOWELL, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
QUINTANILLA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00054
Petitioner: MIGUEL A. QUINTANILLA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
BOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00051
Plaintiff: RICKEY BOYD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KOONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2008cv00191
Petitioner: ANDREW C. KOONS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HARDIMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv00446
Petitioner: LESLIE T HARDIMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RAYMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2008cv00200
Petitioner: LARRY P. RAYMER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WOODWORTH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2008cv00161
Petitioner: MURRAY ALLEN WOODWORTH
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GOODWIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2008cv00159
Petitioner: VICTOR GOODWIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?