Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,605
LOVE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00920
Petitioner: MARVIN LOVE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00891
Petitioner: DUJUAN LUCAS and DEJUAN LUCAS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TINSLEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00865
Petitioner: GARY TINSLEY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner: ANTOINE HOPKINS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner: DAQUWON RICHARDSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner: OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner: SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRATT v. USA
as 4:2024cv00058
Petitioner: SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HAMILTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00706
Petitioner: LEMARKUS HAMILTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MILLER v. USA
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner: KERRI MILLER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?