Cases 61 - 70 of 372
Pearl IP Licensing LLC v. MSA Safety Incorporated
as 4:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Pearl IP Licensing LLC
Defendant:
MSA Safety Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ross v. Prado et al
as 4:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
James 'Joe' Ross and James 'Joe' Ross doing business as DJ Joe Ross
Defendant:
Christopher A Prado and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Plotagraph, Inc. et al v. Lightricks, Ltd.
as 4:2021cv03873
Plaintiff:
Plotagraph, Inc., Troy Plota and Sascha Connelly
Defendant:
Lightricks, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
WordLogic Corporation et al v. Nvent Electric PLC et al
as 4:2021cv03804
Plaintiff:
WordLogic Corporation, 602531 BRITISH COLUMBIA LTD., and 602531 British Columbia Ltd.
Defendant:
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC, NVENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY and NVENT THERMAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 4:2021cv03815
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 70.139.135.27 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JRT Gauges, LLC v. Jones
as 4:2021cv03344
Plaintiff:
JRT Gauges, LLC
Defendant:
James Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cabinets to Go LLC v. RTG Cabinets LLC
as 4:2021cv03308
Plaintiff:
Cabinets to Go LLC
Defendant:
RTG Cabinets LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
YETI Coolers, LLC v. Igloo Products Corporation
as 4:2021cv03203
Counter Defendant:
YETI Coolers, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Igloo Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. LT Security Inc.
as 4:2021cv02996
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
LT Security Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ASHH, Inc., et al, v. URZ Trendz LLC
as 4:2021cv02949
Plaintiff:
ASHH, Inc. d/b/a Ooze Wholesale and ASHH, Inc. doing business as Ooze Wholesale
Defendant:
URZ Trendz LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
