Cases 31 - 40 of 8,251
Clement v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Ms. Stephanie Clement
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01305
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
English v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
James Thomas English
Respondent:
The United States of America and Brazoria County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farmer v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00690
Petitioner:
Charles M Farmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tijerina v. NewRez LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Macarena Tijerina
Defendant:
NewRez d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, UMB Bank, National Association and NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Williams v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Harris County Jail
as 4:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Degioanni v. The Kroger Corporation
as 4:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Amy Degioanni
Defendant:
The Kroger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00689
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
