Featured Cases tagged 'complaint'
Cases 81 - 90 of 148
Simona Tanasescu v. The State Bar of California et al Featured Case
as 8:2011cv00700
Defendant: E Daniel Bors III, E Daniel Bors Jr, Robert K Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Simona Tanasescu
Cline v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline Featured Case
as 1:2011cv21639
Plaintiff: Ella Cline
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation Featured Case
as 1:2011cv21631
Plaintiff: Eunice Nelson
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kapilivsky v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation Featured Case
as 1:2011cv21623
Plaintiff: Saul Kapilivsky
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClendon v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation Featured Case
as 1:2011cv21622
Plaintiff: Cynthia McClendon
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation Featured Case
as 0:2011cv61029
Plaintiff: Carmen M. Padilla
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. 1854louisvuitton.com et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00738
Defendant: 1854louisvuitton.com, 21centurybags.co, 21replica.com and others
Plaintiff: Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Ferrer v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline Featured Case
as 1:2011cv21637
Plaintiff: Josefa Ferrer
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrer v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline Featured Case
as 0:2011cv61018
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Siegel v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation Featured Case
as 0:2011cv61020
Plaintiff: Donna Siegel
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?