Cases 11 - 20 of 5,689
Beadle v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv02045
Petitioner:
Jack Eugene Beadle
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abdikarim v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv02013
Petitioner:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Respondent:
State of Minnesota, Ottertail County States Attorney, Cass County Jail ND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 0:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Barry Fitzgibbons, Tim Brennan and Michelle Marie Eldien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv01999
Petitioner:
Kevin Ronnell Lynch
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
MacDermott v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Troy Nicholas MacDermott
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Collette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xia v. King
as 0:2024cv02000
Petitioner:
Zhijun Xia
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahlberg v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01989
Petitioner:
Arne Henry Mahlberg
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kalombo v. Matthew et al
as 0:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kalombo
Defendant:
Matthew and Kandiyohi County Jail, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalombo v. Skillet
as 0:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kalombo
Defendant:
Skillet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01909
Petitioner:
Alvin Perkins
Respondent:
Linda Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
