Social Security Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,169
BROUGH v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: THELMA D. BROUGH
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harms v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: Holly C. Harms
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: Donald Brown
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GRIFFIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00881
Plaintiff: TANISHA N. GRIFFIN
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
ROBERTSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00888
Plaintiff: NORMAN LEON ROBERTSON, III
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KNOWLES v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: TREVOR C. KNOWLES
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff: JAMES O. DAVIS
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff: Debra Jean Bishop
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STILL v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY ALAN STILL
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Huelsmeyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff: Angela S Huelsmeyer
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?