Cases 1 - 10 of 23,018
ANDERS v. SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANDERS
Defendant:
SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC., UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Walsh et al v. Auger et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Allison Walsh and Matthew Walsh
Defendant:
John Alton Auger and JA Auger LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
COPENY v. INDIANAPOLIS POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
GARY COPENY
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS POLICE, FLINT POLICE and JACKSONVILLE POLICE
COPENY v. ENGLAND et al
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
GARY COPENY
Defendant:
DIANA ENGLAND, MATT EVANS and DIANA WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FULLER v. MICHAELS STORES, INC.
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
JUDITH FULLER
Defendant:
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wesley v. Menard Inc
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Heather Wesley
Defendant:
Menard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Legan et al v. BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Rosie Legan and Tommy G Dotson
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION, BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHOOL BOARD, COLUMBUS NORTH HIGH SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CHATTIN v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
SOPHIA CHATTIN
Defendant:
ROMELL JONES and BLUE THUNDER TRUCKING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MITCHELL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MITCHELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MONET v. TESLA Inc.
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MONET
Defendant:
TESLA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
