Cases 51 - 60 of 303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Soto Martinez v. Doral Bank Plaza et al
as 3:2020cv01226
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, ABC Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Soto Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Santiago-Lugo
as 20-1315
Respondent:
ERNESTO GONZALEZ-MORALES, AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, BANCO SANTANDER DE PUERTO RICO and others
Petitioner:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Andrade-Cora v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
as 3:2020cv01118
Plaintiff:
Estela M. Andrade-Cora
Defendant:
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Segarra Miranda v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-9006
Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, CARMEN NEREIDA MEDINA GONZALEZ and JOSE ANTONIO LOPEZ CANCEL
Appellant:
WILFREDO SEGARRA MIRANDA, Chapter 7 Trustee
Interested Party:
MONSITA LECAROZ ARRIBAS, US Trustee and MONSITA LECAROZ-ARRIBAS, US Trustee
Soto-Melendez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
as 3:2020cv01057
Plaintiff:
Pedro Soto-Melendez, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
US v. Santiago-Lugo
as 19-2149
Interested Party:
ERNESTO GONZALEZ-MORALES, JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, PR DEPT OF TREASURY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
