Cases 111 - 120 of 95,669
USA v. Baker
as 6:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Antoine Baker
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Whitaker v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024cv06073
Plaintiff:
Mohammed P Whitaker
Defendant:
Sheryl Wilson and Aaron Gitthens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubottom-Langeneckert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Rubottom-Langeneckert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brower v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Sarah Brower
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Enos v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Tracy Enos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Travis John Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Bey v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 4:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Damien Bey
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Radley v. Ascension Health
as 4:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Jill Radley
Defendant:
Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tokarz v. Teja et al
as 4:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Grzegorz Tokarz
Defendant:
Amarjit Teja, Forever Logistic Inc. and Forever Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
