Cases 471 - 480 of 167,470
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Edison Automotive, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Company of Illinois
as 2:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
Edison Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgment
Monk v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Monk
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Manns et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer T Manns, Officer Halib Kahn, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magana et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Carlos Magana and Laura Soler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
Kelli Baker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calhoun v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Elite Construction Design Management, LLC et al v. Kerschner et al
as 2:2023cv00820
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
