U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 646
Ritter, et al v. Johnson
as 22-1621
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID M. RITTER and DIANE F. RITTER
Plaintiff:
CARA JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY JOHNSON
Conlin v. Michael, et al
as 22-1615
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEROME P. CONLIN
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL and DANIEL BERMAN
Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Kovalenko
as 22-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHRYN KOVALENKO
Powers v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC
as 22-1500
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEPHANIE POWERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
RECEIVABLES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, LLC
Universal Trading & Investment Company, Inc. v. Bureau for Representing Ukrainian Interests, et al
as 22-1499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNIVERSAL TRADING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
FOUNDATION HONESTY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR GENERAL'S OFFICE, UKRAINE and BUREAU FOR REPRESENTING UKRAINIAN INTERESTS IN INTERNATIONAL AND FOREIGN COURTS
Jose Santiago, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc., et al
as 22-1491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE SANTIAGO, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC. and SMITHFIELD PACKAGED MEATS CORP.
Sullivan v. etectRx, Inc., et al
as 22-1488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ETECTRX, INC., a Delaware Corporation, JEFFREY P. SPAFFORD, EDWARD H. HENSLEY and others
Andersen v. Vagaro, Inc.
as 22-1471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDI ANDERSEN, d/b/a Dharma Nutrition, LLC, d/b/a Dharma Healing Center
Defendant / Appellee:
VAGARO, INC.
BRT Management LLC v. Malden Storage LLC, et al
as 22-1389
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRT MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
MALDEN STORAGE LLC and PLAIN AVENUE STORAGE LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN WALLACE
Defendant:
BANNER DRIVE STORAGE LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
