U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Crooker v. Global Tel Link, et al
as 12-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GLOBAL TEL LINK and CENTRAL FALLS DETENTION FACILITY, CORPORATION
Evergreen Partnering Group v. Pactiv Corporation, et al
as 12-1730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERGREEN PARTNERING GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
PACTIV CORPORATION, GENPAK, LLC, a/k/a Genpack, LLC, SOLO CUP COMPANY, a corporation and others
Defendant:
POLYSTYRENE FOODSERVICE PACKAGING GROUP, a business group within the American Chemistry Council
Crooker v. Global Tel Link
as 12-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GLOBAL TEL LINK
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant:
CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant:
AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party:
MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Defendant:
ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CO, BAXTER HEMOGLOBIN THERAPEUTICS, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF GREENE, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Interested Party:
OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, LLC, EXCELLUS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, KLINE & SPECTER, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PHARMACIA CORPORATION, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., KREMERS URBAN DEV. CO. and others
Not Classified By Court:
M. JOYCE HOWE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORINNA CONNICK
Plaintiff:
THERESE SHEPLEY, LARRY YOUNG and STATE OF VA
Gonzalez-Maldonado, et al v. MMM Health Care, Inc., et al
as 11-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS P. GONZALEZ-MALDONADO, ANNETTE ACEVEDO-HERNANDEZ and CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP GONZALEZ-ACEVEDO
Defendant - Appellee:
MMM HEALTH CARE, INC., a/k/a Medicare y Mucho Mas, a/k/a MMM, PMC MEDICARE CHOICE, INC., a/k/a PMC and MEDICAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES ORGANIZATION, INC., a/k/a MSO
JPS Elastomerics Corp. v. Specialized Technology Resourc
as 11-1153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JPS ELASTOMERICS CORP.
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALIZED TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES, INC.
Orocovis Petroleum Corp., et al v. Sosa, et al
as 10-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OROCOVIS PETROLEUM CORP.
Plaintiff:
JOSE F. COLON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED SOSA
Defendant:
EMPRESAS SANTANA INC., AIRPORT AVIATION AIRPORT AVIATION SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Empresas Santana Inc., AIRPORT SHOPPES AND HOTEL CORPORATION and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 10-1959
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant - Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Appellant:
DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
Sterling Merchandising, Inc. v. Nestle SA, et al
as 10-1925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STERLING MERCHANDISING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
NESTLE SA, PAYCO FOODS CORPORATION and NESTLE PUERTO RICO, INC.
Defendant:
NESTLE HOLDINGS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Interested Party:
PMC MARKETING CORP.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
