Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 42,029
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Saldivar et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Daniel Saldivar, Michael Wolfe, Zurrell Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Scott Crow, John or Jane Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Nuneviller v. Stash et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Sara Michelle Nuneviller
Defendant:
Stash and Apex Clearing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Murray City Police Department
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Janay Brooks
Defendant:
Murray City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Patterson et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Garcia
Defendant:
Jeff Patterson, Jessie Rodriguez and City of Carlsbad NM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Holz v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Thomas
Defendant:
United States District Court and District of New Mexico Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
